|

GUIDE
TO THE PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW
(Law
No.85, 1994)
1.
Introduction of the Product Liability System
Through the rapid
development of science and technology and aggressive
innovation in economic activities, Japan has attained a
society of mass production and mass consumption. On the
other hand, because consumers use and consume high-tech
and complicated products daily, their safety primarily
depends on product manufacturers.
Therefore, in order to
change the principle of liability for damages in
product-related accidents from "negligence" to
"defect", and relieve the injured persons in a
swift and appropriate manner, the Product Liability Law
shall come into force from July 1, 1995. With the
introduction of the Product Liability system, it is
expected that the way of thinking and the approach
concerning product safety of both the industry business
segment and the consumer segment will change and
improve.
2.
What is Product Liability?
(1)
Definition of Product Liability
Product Liability shall
be defined as liability for damages in such case as
follows:
In the case where due to a defect in the delivered
product, a life, a body or property of another person
(including a third party not using or consuming the
product directly, and a legal person as well as a
natural person) is injured, the person who manufactured,
processed, imported or put his name, etc. on the product
as business is liable for damages of the injured person.
(2)
Significance of Introduction of the Product Liability
Law
Previously in Japan,
claims for damages have usually been made based on the
Civil Code Article No.709 in case the injury is caused
by a defect in the product. The Civil Code Article
No.709 employs the "fault-based liability
(negligence) principle", and requires the
"intention or fault" of the manufacturer, etc.
as a condition for liability.
The Product Liability
Law takes the "defect in the product" as a
condition for liability instead of the "intention
or fault" of the manufacturer, etc. Therefore,
after introduction of the Product Liability Law, the
injured has only to verify the "defect in the
product" for claiming damages.
| Civil
Code Article No.709 |
Product
Liability Law |
- The
damage
- The
intention or fault of the accused
- The
causal relationship between the damage and the
intention or fault
|
- The
damage
- The
defect in the product (at the time
distribution commences)
- The
causal relationship between the damage and the
defect
|
The Product Liability
Law can be said to employ the "liability without
fault principle", that is, the manufacturer, etc.
is liable for damages if the injury is caused by a
defect in the product regardless of whether it was his
intention or fault. However, the manufacturer, etc. is
not liable when there is no defect in the product. As
the Product Liability Law is a means for claiming
damages, the plaintiff side bears the burden of proof
for the above-mentioned 1) - 3). The enactment of the
Product Liability Law means a change in the liability
rule from fault-based liability
principle -To- defect-based
liability principle
3.
Points of the Product Liability Law
(1)
Scope of the product
By definition,
"product" means movable property manufactured
or processed. Therefore, incorporeal property such as
services, information, software, electricity, etc., and
immovables are not the object of the Law. Moreover,
agricultural, forestal, marine and mineral products
which are not processed artificially are not the object
of the Law.
(2)
Parties subject to liability
Parties subject to
liability are as follows:
Manufacturer
Importer
Any person who puts his name, etc. on the product with
such titles as "manufacturer" or
"importer", or any person who puts his name,
etc. on the product in a manner mistakable for its
manufacturer or importer (For instance, any person
selling OEM products using his company brand name) Any
person who, by putting his name, etc. on the product,
may be recognized as its manufacturer-in-fact, in the
light of a manner concerning manufacturing, processing,
importation or sales, and other circumstances (For
instance, any person, even though he puts his name, etc.
on the product with such titles as "seller" or
"sales agency", who is socially recognaized as
its manufacturer-in-fact or is a sole distributor of the
product)
(3)
Concept of the term "defect"
A "defect"
does not mean mere lack of quality of the product, but
means lack of safety in the product which may cause the
injury to life, body, or property. In the law, the term
"defect" is defined as "lack of safety
that the product ordinarily should provide," taking
into account "the nature of the product",
"the ordinarily foreseeable manner of use of the
product", "the time when the manufacturer,
etc. delivered the product", and other
circumstances concerning the product. These three
above-mentioned circumstances include such respective
factors, as are presented below. In the actual trial,
while the weight of each factor is different depending
on individual cases, these factors are comprehensively
taken into account in judging whether the product is
defective or not. Meaning of "the nature of the
product" This means the circumstances of the
product itself, including factors such as the following:
representation of the product (instructions, warnings,
etc. to prevent accidents) effectiveness and usefulness
of the product (compared to its danger) cost vs. effect
(the safety standard of products in the same price
range) probability of occurrence of accident and its
extent ordinary use period and durable period of the
product Meaning of "the ordinarily foreseeable
manner of use of the product" This means the
circumstances concerning use of the product, including
factors such as the following reasonably foreseeable use
of the product possibility of preventing damage from
occurring by the product user Meaning of "the time
when the manufacturer, etc. delivered the product"
This means the circumstances when the manufacturer, etc.
delivered the product, including factors such as the
following: situation at the time the product was
delivered (the safety level required in society at the
time the product was delivered) technological
capabilities(the prior state of safety regulations and
possibility of alternative design)
(4)
Exemptions
Development Risk
Defense, The Product Liability Law admits
"Development Risk Defense" as an exemption.
This means the manufacturer, etc. shall not be liable
for damages, if the manufacturer, etc. proves that the
state of "scientific or technical knowledge"
at the time when the manufacturer, etc. delivered the
product was not such as to enable the existence of the
defect in the product to be discovered. "Scientific
or technical knowledge" means all the established
knowledge that could influence the decision on the
existence of the defect, and not the knowledge held by a
peculiar person but the total knowledge that objectively
exists in society. Component or Raw Material
Manufacturer's Defense Insofar as components or raw
materials are "products" movable property
manufactured or processed, their manufacturers are also
subject to liability in the Law. However, if the
manufacturer, etc. of a component or raw material proves
that the defect is substantially attributable to
compliance with the instructions concerning the
specifications given by the assembling manufacturer who
incorporates the component or raw material into another
product, and that the manufacturer, etc. is not
negligent on occurrence of the defect, the manufacturer
of the component or raw material shall not be liable for
damages.
(5)
Time Limitations
The right for damages
provided in the Law shall be extinguished by
prescription if the injured person or his legal
representative does not exercise their rights within the
following period: A period of three years from the time
when the injured person or his legal representative
becomes aware of the damage and the liable party for the
damage (short-term nagative prescription) A period of
ten years from the time when the manufacturer, etc.
delivered the product (long-term liable period)
| Concerning
introduction of the Product Liability Law, the
cooperation of all divisions of a company are
indispensable. Namely, not only development,
design, manufacturing and quality control
divisions, but also general affairs, law and
consumer divisions, etc. are recommended to
cooperate with each other on product safety
measures. |
| In
case injury to life, body, or property is caused
by a defect in the product, all product-related
manufacturers as well as the assembling
manufacturer of the finished product shall be
liable jointly and severally for the damages
described in the Law. |
Comparison the
Product liability Law with Product Liability System of
EU and U.S.
| |
Japan |
European
Union |
USA |
|
The
P L Law |
EC
Product Liability Directive (Council Directive of
25 July1985) |
(Judicial
Precedents) |
| Principle
Liability for Damages |
Liability
without Fault Principle (Defect-based Liability
Principle) |
Burden
of Proof
(Adoption of Presumption Rule) |
The
plaintiff side bears the burden of proof of
damage, defect and causal relationship between
defect and damage. |
|
No |
No |
No |
|
(flexible
application of empirical rules and inference) |
|
Preponderance
of the Evidence
Discovery |
| Adoption
of Development Risk Defense |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
(option:
adopted by 12 of 14 countries) |
(state
of the art defense) |
| Liable
Period |
10
years from the delivery of the product (10 years
from the time the damage arises in case such
damage as caused by accumulation of substances or
others) |
10
years from the delivery of the product |
10
years from the delivery of the product (in many
states) |
The
Product Liability Law (Law No.85, 1994)
Article
1:Purpose
The purpose of this Law
is to relieve the injured person by setting forth
liability of the manufacturer, etc. for damages when the
injury on a life, a body, or property is caused by a
defect in the product, and thereby to contribute to the
stabilization and improvement of the people's life and
to the sound development of the national economy.
Article 2: Definitions
(1) As used in this Law,
the term "product" means movable property
manufactured or processed.
(2) As used in this Law,
the term "defect" means lack of safety that
the product ordinarily should provide, taking into
account the nature of the product, the ordinarily
foreseeable manner of use of the product, the time when
the manufacturer, etc. delivered the product, and other
circumstances concerning the product.
(3) As used in this Law,
the term "manufacturer, etc." means any one of
the following:
any person who
manufactured, processed, or imported the product as
business (hereinafter called just
"manufacturer"); any person who, by putting
his name, trade name, trade mark or other feature
(hereinafter called "representation of name,
etc.") on the product presents himself as its
manufacturer, or any person who puts the representation
of name, etc. on the product in a manner mistakable for
the manufacturer; apart from any person mentioned in the
preceeding subsections, any person who, by putting the
representation of name, etc. on the product, may be
recognized as its manufacturer-in-fact, in the light of
a manner concerning manufacturing, processing,
importation or sales, and other circumstances.
Article 3:Product Liability
The manufacturer, etc.
shall be liable for damages caused by the injury, when
he injured someone's life, body or property by the
defect in his delivered product which he manufactured,
processed, imported or put the representation of name,
etc. as described in subsection 2 or 3 of section 3 of
Article 2 on. However, the manufacturer, etc. is not
liable when only the defective product itself is
damaged.
Article 4:Exemptions
In cases where Article 3
applies, the manufacturer, etc. shall not be liable as a
result of Article 3 if he proves; that the state of
scientific or technical knowledge at the time when the
manufacturer, etc. delivered the product was not such as
to enable the existance of the defect in the product to
be discovered; or in the case where the product is used
as a component or raw material of another product, that
the defect is substantially attributable to compliance
with the instruction concerning the specifications given
by the manufacturer of the said another product, and
that the manufacturer, etc. is not negligent on
occurrence of the defect.
Article
5:Time Limitations
(1) The right for
damages provided in Article 3 shall be extinguished by
prescription if the injured person or his legal
representative does not exercise such right within 3
years from the time when he becomes aware of the damage
and the liable party for the damage. The same shall also
apply upon the expiry of a period of 10 years from the
time when the manufacturer, etc. delivered the product.
(2)The period in the
latter sentence of section 1 of this Article shall be
calculated from the time when the damage arises, where
such damage is caused by the substances which are
harmful to human health when they remain or accumulate
in the body, or where the symptoms for such damage
appear after a certain latent period.
Article
6:Application of Civil Code
In so far as this law
does not provide otherwise, the liability of the
manufacturer, etc. for damages caused by a defect in the
product shall be subject to the provisions of the Civil
Code (Law No.89, 1896).
Supplementary Provisions
This Law shall come into
force the day after one year from the date of
promulgation, and shall apply to the products delivered
by the manufacturer, etc. after this Law comes into
force. Partial Amendment of the Law on Compensation for
Nuclear Damage The Law on Compensation for Nuclear
Damage (Law No.147, 1961) shall be partially amended as
follows:
In section 3 of Article
4 of that Law, "and the Law relating to the
Limitation of the Liability of shipowners (Law No.94,
1975)" shall be amended as ", the Law relating
to the Limitation of the Liability of shipowners (Law
No.94, 1975) and the Product Liability Law (Law No.85,
1994)".
|